<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>What I Know &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatiknow.net/tag/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatiknow.net</link>
	<description>It's About Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 01:32:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<meta name="generator" content="1.0" />
		<item>
		<title>The Internet&#8217;s Secret Back Door</title>
		<link>http://www.whatiknow.net/2010/09/the-internets-secret-back-door/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatiknow.net/2010/09/the-internets-secret-back-door/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 01:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fahad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Awareness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatiknow.net/?p=1285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Web users in the United Arab Emirates have more to worry about than having just their BlackBerries cracked. The United Arab Emirates continues to wrestle with Research in Motion over government access to BlackBerry messages, threatening to ban the company's services if it doesn't severely weaken the anti-snooping protections on its smartphones. But years before [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatiknow.net/2010/09/the-internets-secret-back-door/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1024-bit RSA encryption cracked!!</title>
		<link>http://www.whatiknow.net/2010/03/1024-bit-rsa-encryption-cracked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatiknow.net/2010/03/1024-bit-rsa-encryption-cracked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fahad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacked]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatiknow.net/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since 1977, RSA public-key encryption has protected privacy and verified authenticity when using computers, gadgets and web browsers around the globe, with only the most brutish of brute force efforts (and 1,500 years of processing time) felling its 768-bit variety earlier this year. Now, three eggheads (or Wolverines, as it were) at the University of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatiknow.net/2010/03/1024-bit-rsa-encryption-cracked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>INFECTED HARDWARE !!</title>
		<link>http://www.whatiknow.net/2010/03/infected-hardware/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatiknow.net/2010/03/infected-hardware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fahad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Awareness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatiknow.net/?p=1242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received this interesting news today from my friend Lance. he said that he have read of several instances where hardware was infected but this is the first time he seen it officially reported in a CERT alert. The Energizer DUO, a USB-powered battery recharger was distributing malicious code that infected windows systems. The hardware device itself does [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatiknow.net/2010/03/infected-hardware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlie Miller: Snow Leopard is not as secure as Windows Vista/7</title>
		<link>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/09/charlie-miller-snow-leopard-is-not-as-secure-as-windows-vista7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/09/charlie-miller-snow-leopard-is-not-as-secure-as-windows-vista7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fahad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mac OSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatiknow.net/?p=1179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Snow Leopard lacks security features that are built in to Windows XP, Windows Vista and Windows 7, a noted Mac researcher has said. Dubbed ASLR, for address space layout randomization, the technology randomly assigns data to memory to make it tougher for attackers to determine the location of critical operating system functions, and thus make [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/09/charlie-miller-snow-leopard-is-not-as-secure-as-windows-vista7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remote 0day Exploit for Vista, 2008 in the Wilde</title>
		<link>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/09/remote-0day-exploit-for-vista-2008-in-the-wilde/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/09/remote-0day-exploit-for-vista-2008-in-the-wilde/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fahad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatiknow.net/?p=1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a flaw in SMB2.0 which exists (I mean the SMBv2 itself not the vulnerability) in windows vista, 2008,7 and 2008 R2 but only Windows Vista &#38; 2008 are vulnerable. If you exploited this flaw successfully you will crash &#38; reboot any vista or 2008 remotely (of course only if SMB 445 port open ). Anyhow here [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/09/remote-0day-exploit-for-vista-2008-in-the-wilde/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software Protects You From &#8216;Shoulder Surfers&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/06/software-protects-you-from-shoulder-surfers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/06/software-protects-you-from-shoulder-surfers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fahad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Awareness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatiknow.net/?p=1100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some guy has developed software that allows only an authorized person to see what is on the screen, everyone else just sees gibberish. Sounds interesting, I’d like to see it in action though. Chameleon uses gaze-tracking software and camera equipment to track an authorized reader's eyes to show only that one person the correct text. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/06/software-protects-you-from-shoulder-surfers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UAC security flaw in Windows 7 beta</title>
		<link>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/02/uac-security-flaw-in-windows-7-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/02/uac-security-flaw-in-windows-7-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fahad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatiknow.net/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ نزل خبر اليومين اللي راحت  بالاانترنت بعنوان  UAC Security Flaw in Windows 7 Beta  الخ الخ .. طبعا انا حالي حال اي شخص متابع ومهتم بالتقنيه شدني الخبر فا بديت اقرى  و حملت السكربت  بجهازي لتجربه الثغره كما  يقال عشان اشوف هل فعلا بيعطل ال UAC والمستخدم نايم في العسل مايدري ولا كيف ؟؟ المهم بعد ماحملت [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatiknow.net/2009/02/uac-security-flaw-in-windows-7-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft: EMERGENCY Patch for Windows Today</title>
		<link>http://www.whatiknow.net/2008/10/microsoft-emergency-patch-for-windows-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatiknow.net/2008/10/microsoft-emergency-patch-for-windows-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fahad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatiknow.net/?p=435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[على غير عاده مايكروسوفت (مايكروسوفت تصدر التحديثات كل ثلاثاء) راح تقوم باصدار تحديث اليوم لثغره خطيره جداا تم اكتشافها في نظام تشغيلها ويندوز ومن الممكن ان يتم استغلال هذه الثغره عن بعد ويعطي الهاكر كامل الصلاحيات على جهازك. وبناء على تصريح مايكروسوفت الثغره هذه موجوده بانظمه ويندوز من ويندوز 2000 الى ويندوز 2008 .. وتنصح [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatiknow.net/2008/10/microsoft-emergency-patch-for-windows-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secunia – Exploits vs Internet Security Suites</title>
		<link>http://www.whatiknow.net/2008/10/secunia-%e2%80%93-exploits-vs-internet-security-suites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatiknow.net/2008/10/secunia-%e2%80%93-exploits-vs-internet-security-suites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fahad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatiknow.net/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[بعد اختبار اجرته شركه Secunia والمختصه في متابعه الثغرات على الانترنت تبين ان برامج الحمايه المتكامله لا تحمي المستخدم بالشكل المطلوب. الاختبار اجري على 12 برنامج حمايه ضد 300 نوع من الهجمات المنتشره على الانترنت  وكانت نتيجه الاختبار مخيبه بحيث كانت شركه سيمانتك ببرنامجها Norton Internet Security 2009 الافضل باكتشافها وتصديها لـ 64 نوع من [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatiknow.net/2008/10/secunia-%e2%80%93-exploits-vs-internet-security-suites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hackers Clone Elvis&#8217; Passport :)</title>
		<link>http://www.whatiknow.net/2008/10/hackers-clone-elvis-passport/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whatiknow.net/2008/10/hackers-clone-elvis-passport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fahad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatiknow.net/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THC/vonJeek proudly presents an ePassport emulator. This emulator applet  allows you to create a backup of your own passport chip(s). The government plans to use ePassports at Immigration and Border Control. The information is electronically read from the Passport and displayed to a Border Control Officer or used by an automated setup. THC has discovered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whatiknow.net/2008/10/hackers-clone-elvis-passport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
